"

Chapter 8a: Discussion Question & Activities

Discussion Questions for Chapter 8a

  1. How does the plant-based food movement, exemplified by companies like Impossible Foods, contribute to sustainability? Are there any potential drawbacks?
  2. Discuss the impact of dietary changes, like incorporating mushrooms into burgers, on environmental sustainability. What are other examples of simple dietary changes that could have a significant impact?
  3. What are the potential environmental and economic benefits of reducing food waste? How can businesses and consumers be motivated to engage in these practices?
  4. Evaluate the ethical considerations of using animal labor in sustainable farming. What are the benefits and drawbacks?
  5. Are you from an area that has food insecurity? Refer to a map on the Internet that reflects food insecurity around the world. Why do you think some areas are more impacted than others?
  6. Discuss the concept of upcycled foods and their role in sustainability. What are other innovative approaches to reducing food waste that you can think of?
  7. What role can partnerships between businesses, farms, and nonprofits play in building a more sustainable food system, and how can companies ensure these partnerships are authentic rather than performative?
  8. Have you seen any of the certificates shown in this chapter before? If so, where? If not, where could you find them?
  9. Discuss the role of certifications like USDA Organic and Fair Trade in consumer decision-making. Are these labels effective in promoting sustainability?
  10. Summarize the tips for responsible food marketing when communicating about a product’s environmental impact. If you can, share an example of at least one of the tips.

 

Activity 1: Exploring Personal Food Choices and Shopping Habits

Objective: Reflect on your own dietary choices and shopping habits in relation to sustainability and personal health.

Instructions:

  1. Self-Reflection Journal Entry:
    • Reflect on your current diet. Describe the proportions of plant-based, organic, upcycled, and conventional foods you typically consume.
    • Consider the reasons behind your dietary choices. Are they influenced by health concerns, environmental impact, cost, taste, or availability?
  2. Shopping Habits Survey:
    • Create a list of the types of food you commonly purchase (e.g., dairy, meat, vegetables, grains). Next to each item, note if you prefer organic, conventional, local, or a specific brand
    • Reflect on your willingness to pay more for food items labeled organic, plant-based, or sustainable. What factors influence your decision to pay a premium for these foods?
  3. Impact Analysis:
    • Research and write summary (200-300 words) on how one aspect of your diet (e.g., meat consumption, organic foods, plant-based diet) impacts the environment. Utilize resources provided in the textbook or from credible online sources.
    • Also include how much food you tend to throw away and how often (each day, week, or month, etc.). Do you compost or use landfill?
  4. Future Considerations:
    • Based on what you’ve learned in this chapter and your reflections, outline any changes you might consider making to your diet, shopping habits, or food waste to support the environment. Explain your reasoning.

 

Activity 2: Uncovering Greenwashing in Food Marketing

Activity 2: Uncovering Greenwashing in Food Marketing

Objective: identify and critically analyze instances of greenwashing in food and agricultural businesses, enhance media literacy and ethical evaluation skills.

Instructions:

  1. Research a food product or brand that has been accused of greenwashing. Possible sources for finding examples include news articles, consumer reports, and sustainability watchdog websites.
  2. Gather information on the product’s marketing claims related to sustainability (e.g., “eco-friendly,” “all-natural,” “sustainable,” “humane”).
  3. Analyze the company’s marketing claims by researching the actual practices o behind the product. Consider the following aspects:
    • Does the company provide evidence to support its claims? Are there any independent verifications?
    • How transparent is the company about its sourcing, production processes, and environmental impact?
    • Are there contradictions between the company’s claims and its known practices or third-party reports?
  4. Prepare a brief report detailing the findings, focusing on why the claim was perceived as greenwashing.
  5. Create a presentation summarizing the research and analysis. Include visual aids such as screenshots of marketing materials, comparison charts, and any relevant certifications or lack thereof. Discuss the potential impact of such greenwashing on consumers and the environment.
  6. After presentations, facilitate a class discussion on the common themes and tactics observed in greenwashing practices. Propose strategies that consumers can use to avoid being misled by greenwashing.

 

 

Activity 3: Debate on Sustainable Food Practices

Objective: Enhance critical thinking and argumentation skills by engaging in a structured debate on controversial topics related to sustainable food practices.

Instructions:

  • Get into a group (2-4 people) and choose a debate topic from the chapter (or receive one from the instructor). Possible topics include:
    • “Is a plant-based diet more environmentally sustainable than a traditional diet?”
    • “Is a plant-based diet healthier than a meat-eating diet?”
    • “Should consumers prioritize purchasing organic food over conventional food?”
    • “Should farmers use GMOs in agriculture?”
    • “Should businesses be required to donate unsold food to nonprofits rather than discard it?”
    • “Is it more ethical for companies to invest in plant-based innovation or to improve the sustainability of meat production?”
    • “Do sustainability certifications (like ‘organic’ or ‘fair trade’) genuinely reflect environmentally responsible practices?”
    • “Should food companies be held accountable for misleading environmental claims in their advertising?”
    • “Is animal labor a viable alternative to machinery in efforts to lower carbon emissions?”
    • “Do partnerships between corporations and environmental nonprofits actually lead to meaningful change, or are they just PR (public relations)?”
    • “Should governments subsidize plant-based agriculture more than livestock farming to fight climate change?”
    • “Can small farms compete fairly with large corporations in promoting sustainable practices?”
    • “Should restaurants be penalized for excessive food waste?”
    • “Is lab-grown meat a more realistic solution to global food sustainability than plant-based meat?”
  • Each group will research their topic, gather evidence to support both pro and con positions. Use scientific studies, expert opinions, and statistical data from reputable sources.
  • Prepare to articulate your arguments clearly, anticipate counterarguments, and formulate rebuttals. Refer to a previous chapter on effective arguments and counterarguments.

Debate Structure:

  • Each debate will consist of an opening statement (1 minute), argument (2 minutes), rebuttal round (1 minute), and a closing statement (1 minute).
  • Allocate specific times for each part of the debate to ensure that all teams have equal opportunities to present their cases.

Execution:

  • Conduct the debates in class. Each team presents their arguments and rebuttals, adhering to the structured format.
  • Encourage a respectful and constructive exchange of ideas, emphasizing the importance of listening to opposing viewpoints.
  • While other groups are presenting, the audience should be taking notes in order to vote for who they think won the debate and to write a reflection afterward.

Reflection and Discussion:

  • After each debate, discuss what you learned and how your perspectives may have shifted.
  • Consider the complexities of each issue and the importance of evidence-based decision-making.
  • Write a paragraph reflecting on how all the debates went. Reflect on whether any of the arguments presented during the debates changed your views on the issues discussed. Discuss any personal resolutions or changes you plan to make in your own shopping or eating habits based on what you learned.

 

Rubric for the Debate Activity

Criteria 5 (Excellent) 4 (Good) 3 (Adequate) 2 (Needs Improvement) 1 (Poor)
Presentation The presentation is well-organized, clear, and visually appealing. Speakers use a confident tone and maintain eye contact. The presentation is organized and clear with minor issues in visual aids or delivery. The presentation lacks some organization, has unclear visual aids, or speakers frequently read from notes. The presentation is disorganized, visuals are unclear or missing, and delivery is poor. The presentation fails to communicate effectively, lacking clarity and organization.
Debating Skills Arguments and rebuttals are logical, well-structured, and effectively counter opposing viewpoints. Uses evidence skillfully. Arguments are mostly logical and structured with some effective rebuttals. Some arguments are logical but lack strong structure or effective rebuttals. Arguments and rebuttals are poorly structured, with little or no logical flow. Fails to form coherent arguments or rebuttals, lacking logical structure completely.
Persuasiveness Highly persuasive; effectively influences the audience using a balanced mix of logical, emotional, and ethical appeals. Generally persuasive, with occasional effective use of rhetorical strategies. Somewhat persuasive but relies too heavily on one type of appeal. Not persuasive; fails to effectively use rhetorical strategies. Lacks persuasive elements, failing to appeal to the audience at any level.
Audience Engagement Actively engages the audience through questioning, direct address, or other interactive methods. Engages the audience, but with less frequency or effectiveness. Occasionally engages the audience but mostly remains disconnected. Does not attempt to engage the audience or is ineffective at all attempts. Completely disengaged from the audience, making no attempt to interact.
Final Written Reflection Provides a comprehensive reflection that is insightful and introspective. Clearly articulates changes in viewpoint and future intentions. Reflection is thorough with some insights and personal resolutions. Provides basic reflection with limited insight or resolution. Reflection is incomplete, lacks depth, or fails to connect with the debate topics. Provides minimal or no reflection on the debate experience.

 

License

Communicating Environmental Sustainability in Business for Global Audiences Copyright © by Marie Moreno. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book